With editor after under review. Under review/Awaiting reviewer scores.

With editor after under review Required Reviews Complete: Day 44, revisions were then submitted back to EES 14 days later (Day 58). My manuscript was first returned by a Springer journal for minor revisions. The second one is lagging”. What does this mean? Meaning of change in status of a revised manuscript from Under Review to With Editor to Under Review I submitted a paper for Springer Journal and it said "editor invited," then after one month it said "editor assigned," and now it says “Under Review". " I submitted my article to an Elsevier journal on August 5, 2020. What does it mean? Has it received good reviews or not? For additional information, please check our peer review policies for Springer, BMC and Nature portfolio or visit the respective journal website. The status “under review” means that the reviewers had accepted the invitation and peer review process had begun. 때로는 여러 단계의 편집자를 거치기도 한다. After this, it went to "Under Review" in a decent time frame and was there for about 4-5 weeks. After three months of 'Under review', the status changed to 'Required review completed' a week ago, then it became 'With editor'. Under Review: Day 65. Etc. I know firsthand how excruciating this process is because it’s almost like your work is in limbo, and you have no idea what to expect. And 11 days later, it changed to "Under review". The fact that the status changed from "Required Reviews Completed This could be for all sorts of reasons, e. On March 24, it changed to Required Reviews Completed, and then, changed to Decision in Process. Editor "got to" the manuscript before you did. The automated systems will shift status from “Under 提示二： Reviewer（s） invited代表找到审稿人了，即将开始审稿。有时候这个状态可能维持一段时间后又变回“with editor”，这有可能是审稿人拒绝审稿，编辑正在寻找其他审稿人。 6. While the specifics may vary, here are some common explanations for this status change: 1. . 9k次。本文详细解读了SCI投稿过程中常见的审稿阶段缩写，从作者到主编，再到审稿人、AE和EIC的角色，以及投稿状态变化如Submitted、Under review、Accepted等，涵盖了整个决策流程的关键节点和 Dear Mr. After 5 days, the status changed to "Editor invited". After the 1st round of review one of the reviewers rejected the manuscript and subsequently the paper was rejected by the editor. Literature review; Introduction in research; Under "Editor Evaluation" Ethics in research; See more. Under Review: Day 14. Once the editor was assigned, the status changed to "With an Editor. The status "Editor Assigned" typically indicates that an Associate 又到毕业季了，小伙伴们文章都发了吗？是否还有人在每天盯着论文投稿页面上的状态栏焦急等待？那么 你投出去的manuscript到了哪一步 ， 投稿状态中的各种术语都代表什么意思呢 ？ 大概多久才能知道结果呢？ 从 AE not Assigned、Under Review、AE Assigned、Under Review 到 Evaluation Recommendation，为什么 review 了两次，发生了啥？ 解：多数时候 Under Review 指的是审稿人外审，部分期刊也用它表示编辑在内审，所以才会让人产生以上疑问。 具体可以结合时间节点、前后的稿件状态来 "With editor" means an editor has been assigned, but no reviewers have been invited yet. I think @ShakeBaby might have nailed it in the "whatever" comment. After submitting the revised version of my manuscript, it is showing "Editor assigned" for almost 3 months now. /Ms. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Editor Invited (Conditional - this step may not occur): N/A. And now, it’s ‘Under Editor Review. The editor will then decide whether to accept your work as is, request minor or major revisions, or reject the paper due to unresolvable concerns. You’ll typically encounter this status after the “under review” status. After the 4 months of "under review", the status changed to "With Editor" for 4 weeks. Also known as: with editors (APS), waiting for potential reviewer assignment (AIP), under review , I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. 7. ' What does it mean? Answered by Editage Insights on 21 Jan, 2020 . Best guess: reviews came in after all this time but were inconclusive, and "editor assigned" is the default state when needing to get more reviews and no reviewer has actually been assigned. Then it changed to "Under review" on Jan 12. However, the status changed to “with editor” probably Recently I submitted minor revision to springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned "Your manuscript has already passed initial screening by the Chief Editors and will proceed to be assessed by a Section Editor/Associate Editor, who may assign peer reviewers. Once the invitations are sent to reviewers, the The time taken for the different stages in the submission process varies across journals, but it is quite normal for the status to show “With editor” Note that once completed reviews for your submitted article have been received and are under evaluation by the handling Editor the status may later return to 'Under Review' if additional reviews are sought. Or the editor decided to terminate the review process on the strength of that one review. Around 12 days after submission of my revised manuscript, the Editor sent me an email that the manuscript will be handled by the associate editor, but the status was still "With Editor". Decision made – notification imminent: The Action Editor has Thanks for reply. From "Manuscript Submitted" to "with editor" took one day; then it was "with editor" for five days, and then "under review". The editor identifies suitable reviewers and sends out invitations to them, but on many occasions, the reviewers decline the invitations. The status was "with Editor" until 2 weeks and then it went to "under review. ’ However, the status has remained unchanged ever since. But that was after it went from editorial board -> editor -> peer review -> revision, etc. Based on the report, the AE can now make a recommendation to the Editor-in-Chief (EiC) of the journal on whether to accept, reject , or send the manuscript back for revision. The submission systems of some journals use the status "under review" even when the manuscript is under the initial editorial assessment. Moreover, careful revision for grammar and typos have been suggested. This means that so far, your paper was going through a review process. 5 months ago. What's the difference between "decision-in-progress" and "under editor evaluation"? The explanation is as follows; say the minimum reviewer count is set to 3. Edit: you will only receive an email when the editor makes a decision based on I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. , 知乎，中文互联网高质量的问答社区和创作者聚集的原创内容平台，于 2011 年 1 月正式上线，以「让人们更好的分享知识、经验和见解，找到自己的解答」为品牌使命。知乎凭借认真、专业、友善的社区氛围、独特的产品机制以及结构化和 After making the necessary adjustments, I have resubmitted the revised manuscript back on the 14th of October 2017. View all Q&As on this topic Visit the Once the reviews were complete, the manuscript had to be assigned to an Editor who would complete the rest of the evaluation and arrive at a decision. However, status descriptions vary across journals, and some journals also use the status "under review" to refer to the internal review. On the other hand, if the status changes to For most journals, especially Elsevier journals, the status "With Editor" means that the Editor has not performed the initial screening of the paper. ” So, do not be surprised if this happens: once the additional review is completed, the status will come back to “Required Reviews Complete. I have a paper which was invited to be resubmitted after minor revisions. On December 20, I submitted the revised article. Five days after submission, it showed that it was with the editor. If the initial reviews are conflicting, the Action Editor may occasionally decide to approach an additional reviewer. however, for minor revisions, the editor often does not feel the need to send the paper to external reviewers again. By: Alison McGonagle-O’Connell, Marketing Manager, Aries Systems Corporation Once you’ve submitted a manuscript for publication in a journal, you may be anxious about your manuscript status. After one week, I submitted my revised manuscript, responding to all reviewers’ comments. In such cases, the status might go back to “Under Review. " From what I understand, your status was "Under associate editor review" for some time. In case of major revisions, the paper is typically sent for a second round of peer review. You have not mentioned whether there were any other statuses before "Under review. the status moves when 2 reviews have arrived, but only one reviewer submitted a review and the editor's making a decision anyway. Normally, the editor decides the outcome after this. 1. Under Review. In ScholarOne this would be like having it set to require 2 reviews, then when the 2 reviews come in, “With Editor”状态表示编辑正在对手稿进行初审。大部分稿件在此阶段的持续时间是1-2周，如果编辑认为合适的稿件，会送外审，状态也会有所改变（Under Review）；如果认为不合适，则会拒稿。 2. Any article submitted to any journal goes under review if found suitable and within the scope of that journal. – Alex Becker. After one and half months it backs again to the first step i. Does it mean that my paper will be rejected, or could it have already passed from the editor in such a short time? Once a revised paper is submitted, the editor can choose to send it for another round of peer review or review it himself/herself. What does this mean? I have submitted a research paper to a reputed journal. etc. With Editor: Day 2. I have a similar experience. The status “Decision in process” after “Under review” means that all the reviews have come in and the editor is evaluating your paper based on the reviewer’s comments. However, this change should not be cause for 然后，这些审稿人需要足够的时间来全面评审您的稿件。最终，编辑需要评估这些审稿意见并给出决定。特别是“ Under review（正在审稿）” 状态包含很多步骤，虽然您的稿件状态在编辑过程中没有显示进展，但是在这一审稿过程中可能正在发生很多活动。 I submitted a paper to an Elsevier Journal. But now after about ten days from the submission date, it changed to “Decision in Pro Status change from Ready for Decision to under review. We’re sure it must be nerve-wracking waiting for the journal to get back to you! My manuscript status shows "With Editor" after initial submission. Does "Under Review" mean that the paper has passed the editorial check and been given to the external reviewer? 2. " If the status changed to "under review" directly after submission without showing any other status before it, your paper was probably under the internal admin check and not external peer review. The status changed to With Editor on February 28 and to Under Review on March 2/3. I made an inquiry 1 month after submission and got a response which said “One review has been received. My manuscript status was ‘With Editor’ all the way till the fourth week after submission. 也有一些期刊会在With Editor阶段持续半个月到1个月。 If yes, they either proceed with another round of reviews or jump to editorial decision immediately – this mostly depends on the magnitude and nature of the revision. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Under review: The paper is with reviewers for comment or waiting for the Action Editor’s decision. Now, after 35 days, the status has changed from With Editor to Decision Under Process. Required review completed/Pending approval I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Final Disposition: Day 76 ジャーナルに論文を投稿しました。その日のステータスは「With editor」でしたが、翌日になると「Under review」に変わり、その日のうちに「Ready for Decision」になりました。このスピーディーさは、論文のリジェクトを意味しているのでしょうか？ 二、分配编辑 With editor. With Editor: Day 60. So, the status changed to "Editor to complete. After resubmitting, its status changed to "Editor Assigned," "under review," and after about 7 days it became "Editor assigned" again. Commented Jul 22, 2013 at 20:14. I submitted a manuscript 2 months ago. After that we sent a 文章浏览阅读4. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Sometimes, the editor, after going through the reviews, might feel that an additional review is required. Sir I have submitted a manuscript in a reputed journal, it went to "under review" for almost 2 months and then the status changed to "Under Editor Evaluation" . Decision (Accepted): Day 75. Usually, peer review for a revised paper takes shorter time compared to the original manuscript. I'm guessing that the editor-in-chief disagreed with the editor, and either assigned a different editor or sent the manuscript back to the editor. XXX [Editor's Name], I have submitted my revised manuscript titled XXXX [manuscript id: xxxx] to your journal via the online submission system on dd/mm/yyyy [date of submission]. Required Reviews Completed: Day 73. Recent Searches. 等待审稿人返回评审意见阶段。如果被邀请审稿人不想审，就会Decline（拒绝），编辑会重新邀请别的审稿人。一般会有一个审稿限期，但这个时间长短取决于审稿人是否守时。该阶段需要耐心等待。 3. In this case, however, the status went back to under review after I resubmitted. " This implied that the reviews were done but the editor was not yet assigned. In such instances, the editor seeks an alternative reviewer to ensure a comprehensive evaluation. After going through the reviewers’ comments, the editor will make a decision about your manuscript. If the manuscript passes the initial screening, the editor has to send it for peer review. Most likely, you will hear from the journal editor soon with their decision. The status remains With Editor until an Associate Editor is assigned or reviewers are invited. This seems to be a new status information in the Elsevier Review System. The status changed to Under Review on August 30. 投稿结束后等待期刊分配编辑阶段，说法有With editor；AE invited；Awaiting Admin Processing，如果显示为With editor这一状态，则存在两种情况，第一种为Editor Assigned (稿件已分派给相应编辑); 第二种为Editor Declined Invitation（编辑拒绝邀请）。 I just found out that the review status changed to "under editor evaluation" after a four-month review. Deciphering Manuscript Status Changes from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ The transition from ‘Required Reviews Completed’ to ‘Under Review’ in the manuscript submission process can be attributed to various reasons. This decision could either be an acceptance, rejection, or request for revisions. For 3-4 days, the status of my manuscript status was showing to be Editor Assigned and after that status changed to If the status changes to “Under review,” it means that your paper has been sent to a reviewer again. Any idea about this situation? Does this mean the SE and EIC are making the final decision or they need another reviewer to look With Editor. Both reviewers asked me to lengthen the introduction part and rewrite a convincing conclusion according to my research. I have only ever submitted one paper, but it is currently "under review", after being "with editor" for less than a week. "Decision in process" means the editor has made a recommendation to the editor-in-chief. They’ll probably inform you on Monday, best of luck with wherever you decide to submit next! With editor --> this may occur early in the review process, indicating the article is under desk review by relevant editor(s), who are deciding whether to send the paper to reviewers; but it may also occur after reviewer scores are received, indicating the editor is in the process of reading their reports and making a decision. Decision in Process： 表 Hello! I submitted my manuscript to an Elsevier journal 6 months ago. It later turned to ‘Under Review’ and lasted three weeks. Required reviews complete: Some or all assigned reviewers have submitted comments. This means that the paper cleared the initial editorial screening and was sent out for peer review. This status "With Associate Editor" means that the associate editor who is in charge of your manuscript has received the minimum number of reviews (usually 2) for your paper. Then the For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned for the next two days then again changed to under review for Every academic journal runs their review process a bit differently, and sets up the online portals offered by publishers in different ways. After a couple of days, its status changed to “with editor”. The manuscript having an extremely large overlap may be return to the author. I sent 2 emails in the last 2 months asking about the My paper's status changed from 'under review' to 'editor assigned. Yeah I only saw pending recommendation, never “final” before we got the acceptance email. Two days later, the status changed to ‘with editor. See less. The status change indicates that your manuscript was under discussion to arrive at a decision (based on your revisions), and has now come back to the journal editor. Now, more than one month has passed, but the status is still With Editor’ with a change in the date. 논문에 고유 식별 번호가 부여되고 편집자(editor)에게 전달된 상태. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. Then, (after two weeks) it takes "Editor invited". 半个月-1个月. Just after that, the status was changed to “reviewer invited”, but the status has not yet been changed to “under review” for 1 month since then. On the 21st of October the status changed from “with editor” to “under I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. The status was "With Editor" for three weeks, then it changed to "Under review", since 2 weeks. Query regarding possible status of submitted paper. 심사자 선정이 끝나고 심사자에게 논문이 전달된 상태. The reason why this stage takes time is that it is often very difficult for the editor to find reviewers. 1 reviewer#1に対する2回のrevise要求に答えて、reviewer#2は何の質問もなくpublicationをrecommendすると言ってきていました。現在のwith editorとはどういう状態なのでしょうか？ Understanding customized editorial statuses can help authors understand which stage a submission is at within the peer-review process. You may be asking: Meaning of With Editor status after being with the Managing Editor after review fixes, and so on), but the final decision rests with the Editor, or more accurately, Editor-in-Chief (EIC). I sent the review reports addressing all the comments raised by reviewers and letter to editor within a 此时是由同行评审人进行外审，会有漫长的等待期，有些期刊一提交就会显示Under review，别以为已经送审了。论文被拒,这是很常见的状态，顶尖杂志拒稿率可达90%，不要太灰心，调整心情，重新改稿或投递。编辑在处理，正在邀请审稿人，若长时间没找到合适的审稿人，投稿者可向推荐审稿人。 Usually, I get first "with editor" and then "under review". So, why the sudden shift from 'under review' to 'reviewers assigned'? This change typically occurs when one of the original reviewers declines to review your manuscript, after accepting the invitation. After making corrections I have submitted the revised manuscript around 1. What I have heard was that minor revision does not require another round of revision in most of the I had sent a paper to Elsevier. " Around 3 weeks later, they updated the status "under review" again. Under Both the reviewers appreciated the work and had some questions and suggestions for improvement. g. Cite 4 Recommendations 2. The day I submitted the revised version, the status was ‘With Editor'. Since the status of your paper changed to "under review" half a day after being "with editor," I'm inclined to think that "under review" in this case refers to the initial editorial screening. ’ This is a top journal, and so, I wonder if I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. This review could either be the internal check by the editor or peer review. e. Edit: you will only receive an email when the editor makes a decision based on the reviews and will communicate the final result. There can be four possible outcomes: Accept; Reject I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. Stage 4: Decision. 편집자가 심사자(reviewer)를 선정하고 나면 다음 단계로 넘어간다. Under review ：审稿中，此过程的等待较为漫长。 I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned It is common for the peer review status of a manuscript to change several times before a final decision is reached by the editor. 毎日暇さえあればスマホで論文のstatusをチェックしていましたが、なかなかWith EditorからUnder Reviewとならないため1回目のお伺いメールをEditorに送信しました(詳しくはこちら)。 7月16日 翌日早速Assistant Editorを経由してEditorから返事が来ました。 I emailed the journal on the 60th day, and it just so happened that on the 59th day, the Senior Editor passed the manuscript on to a "suitable Academic Editor", ETA: when I have articles submitted, I have a section of my CV for works in progress and Your article could be submitted to the Associated Editor or Editor-in-Chief for one last review before approval or rejection. Now, the stage is "With editor". At the moment, the review process if over, and your paper will receive the first decision. Decision in process: The handling editor has drafted a decision, but it Editor of a journal asked for "Major Revision" for a submitted paper, after submitting revised paper it went for the review, after that the status shows "with Editor" for some time. I submitted a manuscript to a reputed journal using Editorial Manager on February 27, 2020. I have not been asked for a revision. Resources for authors and journals Upvote this Answer; 4; Comment. I got review reports after one month of submission. I submitted a manuscript to an Elsevier journal and received comments from two reviewers. On December 5, I received a minor revision decision from one reviewer and a major revision decision from the other. I have submitted my paper to one of the springer journal. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned Hi, My manuscript is under the 3rd round of review, with R1 acceptance and R2 revision in the 2nd round. For a revised manuscript that was Under Review for 10 days, the status changed to With Editor and then again to Under Review. – user7837. Commented Jul 23, 2013 at 0:08 My experience with a springer journal "under consideration" means "under review" and it lasted 1 month after the first month under the status "with editor". After one month, it still showed that it was with the editor, but with a different status date. On December 22, the status changed to Under Review, and has remained so since The status “Under Editor Evaluation” implies that the peer review process is now complete and the Associate Editor (AE) has received the peer review report. Under review: The handling editor has invited peer reviewers to evaluate the submission. " At this point, the status said "With Editor". Source: I’m an associate editor at an elsevier journal and have handled hundreds of papers For most journals, a status change from "With Editor" to "Under review" would indicate that the paper has cleared the editorial check and has been sent for external peer review. So when 3 reviewer comments has come then status will change from under review to under editor evaluation. Under review/Awaiting reviewer scores. Finally, 18 days later, the status changed to "Under review. One and a half months later, the status of the paper was still "under review", but the date of status has changed. What can cause the date in the submission system to change in the absence of a change in status? With Editor: The editor will conduct a similarity check. For the first week of submission, the status was "with editor" and then it changed to under review for one week, then reviewers asigned If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. If the date changes and it’s still under review means that less than two accepted and others have been invited. ” 7. The time taken for the different stages in the submission process varies across journals, but it is quite normal for the status to show “With editor” for over a month after initial submission. Required Reviews Complete： 表示审稿意见已经返回给编辑，等编辑处理。有时候，编辑在看完审稿报告后可能会觉得需要邀请其他审稿人进行审稿。此时，系统的状态就有可能再度变成「Under Review」。 8. Does this mean it got sent to reviewers or the editor is evaluating it? Any experience here? It’s an Elsevier journal. fbex aokwqr ygjchh rpuw wlefzy qvtekv nvrc ooisahcu miieh tch und ffe exk ylqygs fkk