Nsq vs kafka 5K GitHub stars and 2. 复杂路由：选择RabbitMQ，支持多种交换机类型和复杂的消息路由。 简单路由：NSQ足够满足需求，配置简单。 4. Here's a link to NSQ's open source repository on GitHub. 文章浏览阅读1. **架构设计**： - **Kafka**：采用分布式日志的架构，消息会被持久化到磁盘，保证消息的顺序性和持久性。Kafka使用主题（topic）和分区（partition）的概念，使得消息可以被高效地 文章浏览阅读5k次。| NSQNATS持久化支持，需要配置实时性支持高性能支持低资源消耗支持功能：广播支持可追踪支持分布式支持功能：负载均衡支持高可用支持可伸缩支持可靠性非高可 Este artigo do blog descreve a plataforma moderna da fila de mensagens NSQ vs Kafka. 正如之前说的，Nsq是一款极简的消息中间件，前面几讲，我们分别学习了： Nsq的几个组件：MQ（1）—— 从队列到消息中间件 一条消息如何从生产到被消费：MQ(2) —— 一条消息是如何从生产到被消费的 Nsq的一些细节实现：MQ(3) —— 刨根问底 我们还尝试总结了如何设计一个靠谱的MQ：MQ(4 中等吞吐量：RabbitMQ和NSQ均可，具体根据其他需求决定。 4. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub. Comparaison NSQ vs Kafka# NSQ et Kafka Les deux files d’attente de messagerie ont une façon unique de définir leur architecture et le fonctionnement de leur courtier, mais en plusieurs points, cela pourrait être une considération quelle Kafka vs NSQ: What are the differences? Message Delivery guarantee: One key difference between Kafka and NSQ is the message delivery guarantee. Stats. NSQ with 15. 1. RabbitMQ - Open source multiprotocol messaging broker 文章浏览阅读1. 8K Stacks. Imperative Programming vs. L’article fournit des informations sur les systèmes de messagerie distribués NSQ vs Kafka, la comparaison des fonctionnalités pour faciliter les Kafka vs NSQ. kafka有topic和partition的概念，Topic 是一个存储消息的逻辑概念，可以认为是一个消息集合。每条消息发送到 Kafka 集群的消息都有一个类别。 物理上来说，不同的 Topic 的消息是分开存储的，每个 Topic 可以有多个生产者向它发送 引言 在分布式系统中，消息队列扮演着至关重要的角色，它可以帮助我们实现系统的异步解耦、提高系统吞吐量和可用性。NSQ和Kafka都是目前应用广泛的分布式消息队列系统。本文将深入探讨如何使用Golang进行NSQ和Kafka的实战解析，帮助读者更好地理解和应用这两种 一个Goer视角的体验. Understanding the key differences between them is essential for choosing the right tool for your messaging needs. 实现原理1. 实现原理 1. 이 기사는 분산 메시징 시스템 NSQ vs Kafka에 대한 정보, 사용자가 실시간 응용 프로그램에 대한 정보에 근거한 결정을 내릴 수 있도록 기능을 비교하고 미래의 Este artículo de blog describe la plataforma de cola de mensajería moderna NSQ vs Kafka. L’articolo fornisce informazioni sui sistemi di messaggistica distribuita NSQ vs Kafka, confronto tra le funzionalità per facilitare gli utenti a prendere una decisione informata per l’applicazione in tempo reale e anche per la ricerca di ricerche e sviluppo futuri. "Fast" is the top reason why over 20 developers like Beanstalkd, while over 23 developers mention "It's in golang" as the leading cause for choosing NSQ. NSQ: Kafka: Repository: 24,745 Stars: 27,908 844 Watchers: 1,068 2,888 Forks: 13,682 124 days Release Cycle: 20 days almost 3 years ago: Latest Version: over 4 years ago: about 2 months ago Last Commit: 5 days ago More - Code Quality: L2: Go rocketMq在消息存储上设计思路与kafka和NSQ的思路不同，实际存储中既没有分区的概念，也没有按照topic进行存储。 而是将所有topic的消息全部写入同一个文件中（commit Bu blog makalesi, modern mesajlaşma kuyruk platformu NSQ vs Kafka’nın özetlenmesi. Decisions. 7k次。消息队列是分布式系统中重要的中间件，在实现系统高性能，高可用，可伸缩性和最终一致性架构框架中扮演着重要角色。是大型分布式系统不可缺少的核心中间件之一。目前市面上比较常见的消息队列 在公司经常用到kafka和nsq，对他们的区别很好奇，总结一下： 一. Kafka 12. Kafka 由 Linkedin 于 2011 年创建，是一个分布式、分区的、多副本的、多生产者、多订阅者，基于 zookeeper 协调的分布式消息系统。Kafka 优势是支持高吞吐量、低延迟、并且支持持久化存储。同时也拥有众多语言的客户端实现。 NSQ Artikel blog ini menguraikan platform antrian pesan modern NSQ vs Kafka. 3. kafka有topic和partition的概念，Topic 是一个存储消息的逻辑概念，可以认为是一个消息集合。每条消息 topic数量过多选择RocketMq，kafka和NSQ在topic达到几百个之后性能会显著下降。RocketMq可以支持几千个。原因上面有提到，前两者是根据topic和分区来存储文件，topic过多时物理存储的件数量增多，读写会越来越接近于随机IO。 Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system. The team Nsq vs Kafka. Celery vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ ActiveMQ vs Amazon SQS vs RabbitMQ Amazon SQS vs Kafka Kafka vs RabbitMQ. Top Comparisons Dieser Blog -Artikel beschreibt die moderne Messaging -Warteschlangenplattform NSQ vs Kafka. There is a growing need for built in messaging queue plat We will compare NATS, RabbitMQ, NSQ, and Kafka on several criteria including delivery guarantee, ordering guarantee, and throughput and latency. While both systems serve similar purposes, they have key differences in their design and functionality. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS Kafka. NSQとKafkaの比較# NSQとKafkaの両方のメッセージングキューには、アーキテクチャとブローカーの仕組みを定義するユニークな方法がありますが、いくつかのポイントでは、これはあなたが好むプラットフォームを考慮しているかもしれません。 W tym artykule na blogu przedstawia nowoczesną platformę kolejki przesyłania wiadomości NSQ vs Kafka. Bài viết cung cấp thông tin về các hệ thống nhắn tin phân tán NSQ vs Kafka, so sánh các tính năng để tạo điều kiện cho người dùng đưa ra quyết định sáng suốt cho ứng dụng thời gian thực và cũng là cách để nghiên cứu và phát Nsq vs Kafka 正如之前说的，Nsq是一款极简的消息中间件，前面几讲，我们分别学习了： Nsq的几个组件：MQ（1）—— 从队列到消息中间件 一条消息如何从生产到被消费：MQ(2) —— 一条消息 是大型分布式系统不可缺少的核心中间件之一。 目前市面上比较常见的消息队列有ActiveMQ，RabbitMQ，ZeroMQ，Kafka，MetaMQ，RocketMQ，NSQ Celery vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs Redis Amazon SQS vs Kafka Kafka vs RabbitMQ Trending Comparisons Django vs Laravel vs Node. Kafka and MSMQ are both messaging systems used for asynchronous communication between applications. Here are the key differences between Kafka, NSQ, and RabbitMQ. Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ Amazon SQS vs NSQ NSQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ Apache RocketMQ vs Kafka vs NSQ Trending Comparisons Django vs Laravel vs Node. Artykuł zawiera informacje o rozproszonych systemach przesyłania wiadomości NSQ vs Kafka, porównanie Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system. So sánh NSQ vs Kafka# Cả NSQ và Kafka đều có hàng đợi tin nhắn có một cách duy nhất để xác định kiến trúc của họ và cách thức hoạt động của nhà môi giới của họ, nhưng ở một số điểm, đây có thể là một sự cân nhắc mà nền tảng bạn muốn thích: Kafka, NSQ, and RabbitMQ are popular messaging systems used for building distributed systems. . Alternatives. Pros & Cons. How To Install CMAK, Apache Kafka, Java 18, and Java 19 [Video Tutorials] Designing High-Volume Systems Using Event-Driven Architectures. Join us at RethinkConn 2025 on March 20th - a free, virtual event for the NATS community! Celery vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ ActiveMQ vs Amazon SQS vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs Kestrel vs RabbitMQ Trending Comparisons Django vs Laravel vs Node. To understand what Kafka will bring to your architecture, let’s start by talking about message queues. Jobs 11. Pulsar 和 Kafka 对于内置流处理的目标不尽相同。针对较为复杂的流处理需求，Pulsar 集成了 Flink 和 Spark 这两个成熟的流处理框架，并开发了 Pulsar Functions 来处理轻量级计算。Kafka 则开发并使用 Kafka Streams 这一成熟的流处理引擎。 但是，使用 Kafka Streams 要更复杂 NSQ vs ZeroMQ: What are the differences? Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ ActiveMQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ Amazon SQS vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ Celery vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ Kafka vs NSQ. js Bootstrap vs Foundation vs Material-UI Node. On the other hand, NSQ uses a distributed message queue system where messages are pulled by consumers, allowing for more control over message consumption. NSQ 115 Stacks. 9k次，点赞3次，收藏5次。在公司经常用到kafka和nsq，对他们的区别很好奇，总结一下：一. 导语 | 消息队列是分布式系统中重要的中间件，在高性能、高可用、低耦合等系统架构中扮演着重要作用。本文对Kafka、Pulsar、RocketMQ、RabbitMQ、NSQ这几个消息队 rocketMq在消息存储上设计思路与kafka和NSQ的思路不同，实际存储中既没有分区的概念，也没有按照topic进行存储。 而是将所有topic的消息全部写入同一个文件中（commit Celery - Distributed task queue. io/ NATS was originally built with Ruby and achieved a respectable 150k messages per second. Each nats-server node is just a single binary < 15MB vs a JVM plus much more than 15 MBs' worth of JAR files. kafka有topic和partition的概念，Topic 是一个存储消息的逻辑概念，可以认为是一个消息集合。每条消息发送到 Kafka 集群的消息都有一个类别。 物理上来说，不同的 Topic 的消息是分开存储的，每个 Topic 可以有多个生产者向它发送 NSQ# 简单的分布式消息传递组件：NSQ 主要由生产者、消费者和 NSQ 守护进程（nsqd）组成。生产者将消息发送到 nsqd，nsqd 负责存储和转发消息给消费者。它没有像 Kafka 那样依赖额外的组件进行集群协调。 이 블로그 기사는 최신 메시징 큐 플랫폼 NSQ vs Kafka를 간략하게 설명합니다. Scale: can send up to a millions messages per second. Bài viết trên blog này phác thảo nền tảng hàng đợi nhắn tin hiện đại NSQ vs Kafka. kafka消息队列容量 kudu接受kafka消息 kafka 数据 消息队列 spring event和消息队列对比 消息队列 socket对比 最近开始总结消息队列的一些特点，公司中现在用到的消息队列是kafka,于是顺带结合下其他几个消息队列来比较一下1、Kafka、ActiveMQ、RabbitMQ、RocketMQ 有什么优缺点？ Nsq и kafka оба очереди обмена сообщениями имеют уникальный способ определения их архитектуры и того, как работает их брокер, но в нескольких моментах это может быть рассмотрение, какая платформа вы хотели бы предпочесть: NSQ is an open source tool with 15. NSQ - A realtime distributed messaging platform 這篇博客文章概述了現代消息隊列平台NSQ與Kafka。本文提供了有關分佈式消息傳遞系統NSQ與Kafka的信息，《比較功能以促進用戶為實時應用做出明智的決定，並為未來的研究和開發鋪平了道路。 什麼是卡夫卡？ 什麼是NSQ？ 比較NSQ與Kafka; 為什麼要在NSQ上進行卡夫卡？ 3. Description. NSQ vs Redis: What are the differences? Introduction: NSQ and Redis are both popular tools used for message queuing and storage in distributed systems. Question 2: If it is then Kafka vs RabitMQ which is the better? See more. Integrations. This blog article outlines the modern messaging queue platform NSQ vs Kafka. 0. Top Comparisons NATS 好处 vs. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ NATS vs Socket. Add tool. Lyft, SendGrid, and PedidosYa are some of the popular companies that use Amazon SQS, . Persistency: yes. Need advice about which tool to choose? Ask the StackShare community! Get Advice. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub kafka与nats对比，NSQ是用golang编写的高性能分布式消息队列（可以理解为轻量化的kafka），就个人理解来说，消息队列可以看成一个大的buffer，用于信息生产速率和信息消费速率、分布式消息同步，同时也便于一些容灾策略的实现。本系列文章着重点在于深入源码理解，不会写一些大的概念以及整体 In Apache Kafka, you generally need to acknowledge or commit messages in batches. 9K GitHub Yıldızları ve 2. However, they differ in several aspects, which are described below. 3 可靠性需求. js vs Spring Boot Flyway vs Liquibase AWS CodeCommit vs Bitbucket vs GitHub Kafka vs RocketMqRocketMq相较kafka，做的最大的提升在于解决Kafka的劣势：低延迟和高可靠性。 如 RocketMq 官方提到 Unfortunately, Kafka can not meet our requirements especially in terms of low latency and high reliabilitywe decided to in NSQ和Kafka都是流行的分布式消息队列系统，各有其特点和适用场景。以下是它们的主要区别和优缺点： 1. 12K GitHub stars and 748 GitHub forks. The article provides information about distributed messaging systems NSQ vs Kafka, comparison of features to facilitate users to make an informed decision 本文将对他们做简单对比： 2 QoS（服务质量）等级不同Kafka消息持久化：Kafka 的消息被持久化到磁盘，默认配置下即使消费者处理后，消息仍然会保存在磁盘中，直到达到配置的保留策略（如时间或空间限制）。 Kafka provides the lowest latency (5ms at p99) at higher throughputs, while also providing strong durability and high availability*. 4w次，点赞3次，收藏8次。kafka有topic和partition的概念，而nsq有topic和channel的概念，topic这一层上大家概念还比较类似，都是说一种订阅的消息类型。到partition和channel这一层就不同了。工作原理kafka的producer产生特定种类的topic，分发到各个partition中，是没有重复消息的，comsumer本身订阅的 什么是NSQ?NSQ是一个实时分布式消息传递平台。具体特性请前往Nsq官网查看了解，下面是我平常在Springboot项目对Nsq使用的一些技巧。简介 Nsq集成Java可基于JavaNSQClient实现，该jar包帮助我们封装了操作nsq Choosing the Right Message Broker: Kafka vs RabbitMQ vs NATS. IO Amazon SQS vs NSQ NSQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ. 正如之前说的，Nsq是一款极简的消息中间件。 通过前面几讲对Nsq的学习，我们可以更加轻松的上手其他的Mq。 这一节，就让我们在对比中，学习另一种Mq，Kafka，在对比中，加深对Mq的理解。 首先，先放上Nsq和Kafka的架构图。 3. Makale, dağıtılmış mesajlaşma sistemleri NSQ vs Kafka, kullanıcıların gerçek zamanlı uygulama için bilinçli bir karar vermelerini kolaylaştırmak ve ayrıca gelecekteki araştırma ve geliştirme için yol açmasını sağlamak için özelliklerin karşılaştırılması hakkında bilgi Celery vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs Redis Amazon SQS vs Kafka Kafka vs RabbitMQ. Apache RocketMQ - Open source distributed messaging and streaming data platform There are a lot of things that NATS does 'out of the box' for which with Kafka you would have to deploy Kafka Streams, connectors (e. The NATS network element (server) is a small static binary that can be deployed anywhere from large instances in the cloud to resource constrained devices like a Raspberry PI. In Cet article de blog décrit la plate-forme de file d’attente de messagerie moderne NSQ vs Kafka. Message Ordering: Kafka maintains the order of messages within a partition, ensuring that messages NSQ consists of two main components: nsqd and nsqlookupd. Trending Comparisons Django vs Laravel vs Node. 1K views . While all three provide reliable message delivery, they differ in various aspects. Artikel ini memberikan informasi tentang sistem pesan terdistribusi NSQ vs Kafka, perbandingan fitur untuk memfasilitasi pengguna untuk membuat keputusan berdasarkan informasi untuk aplikasi waktu nyata dan juga membuka jalan untuk penelitian dan pengembangan di masa depan. 9 Nsq и kafka оба очереди обмена сообщениями имеют уникальный способ определения их архитектуры и того, как работает их брокер, но в нескольких моментах это может быть рассмотрение, какая در مقایسه با NSQ ، که در 21 پشته شرکت و 8 پشته توسعه دهنده ذکر شده است. O artigo fornece informações sobre os sistemas de mensagens distribuídos NSQ vs Kafka, comparação de recursos para facilitar os usuários para tomar uma decisão informada para aplicação em tempo real e também abrir caminho para pesquisas e desenvolvimento futuros. Der Artikel enthält Informationen zu verteilten Messaging -Systemen NSQ vs Kafka, Vergleich von Funktionen, um den Benutzern eine fundierte Entscheidung für die Anwendung in Echtzeit und auch für zukünftige Forschung und Entwicklung zu ermöglichen. NSQ - A realtime distributed messaging platform. The nsqd (NSQ daemon) is responsible for accepting, storing, and dispatching messages, while nsqlookupd manages topology information and helps to maintain network connections. g. What happens if the processing for one message fails? In RabbitMQ you could just republish that message back to the queue for future processing. 03K forks on GitHub appears to be more popular than Beanstalkd with 5. In the realm of modern software architecture, the importance of message brokers cannot be overstated. ¿Qué es NSQ vs Kafka? NSQ y Kafka son servicios de colas de mensajes. Back End Developer at instabox · Feb 29, 2020 | 7 upvotes · 297. In this article, we will explore the key differences between Kafka and MSMQ. Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system. Additionally, NSQ includes an administrative user interface called nsqadmin for web-based data visualization and 一个Goer视角的体验. ZeroMQ - Fast, lightweight messaging library that allows you to design complex communication system without much effort NSQ Kuyruk Mesajlaşma Sistemi 19. Kafka. 消耗更少的系统资源：比 Kafka 更少的基础设施支出; 用 Go 编写：易于嵌入，不需要像 Kafka 那样单独的服务器实例; 更简单的数据保留：使用 JetStream，比 Kafka 更易于管理和配置保留; 降低管理开销：比 Kafka 更方便开发人员管理和维护 EMQ vs Kafka: What are the differences? Introduction. In Summary, Kafka provides stronger message delivery guarantees, supports message replay and durability, and has better scalability, partitioning, and ecosystem support El artículo proporciona información sobre los sistemas de mensajería distribuidos NSQ vs Kafka, comparación de características para facilitar a los usuarios tomar una decisión Here are the key differences between Kafka, NSQ, and RabbitMQ. NSQ es más simple de configurar y más fácil de implementar la Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ Amazon SQS vs NSQ NSQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ Apache RocketMQ vs Kafka vs NSQ. Today, we will explore three popular message brokers: Kafka, RabbitMQ Kafka vs NATS: A Comparison for Message Processing. In this article, we will explore these differences in detail. Beanstalkd and NSQ are both open source tools. 6K Github Çatalları vardır. نتیجه:# در این مقاله مقایسه مختصری در مورد کار چارچوب های پیام رسانی محبوب - NSQ و Kafka ارائه شده است. kafka 的golang client 官方首推 sarama。一查就出糙点：golang 消费 kafka 的坑 这些库的版本，1. Kafka guarantees at least once delivery of messages, meaning that every message will be delivered at least once. 0都不到。 而go-nsq截至当前已经历16次release至v1. El artículo proporciona información sobre los sistemas de mensajería distribuidos NSQ vs Kafka, comparación de características para facilitar a los usuarios tomar una decisión informada para la aplicación en tiempo real y también allanar el camino para futuras NATS Comparison to Kafka, Rabbit, gRPC, and others. 这篇博客文章概述了现代消息队列平台NSQ与Kafka。本文提供了有关分布式消息传递系统NSQ与Kafka的信息，《比较功能以促进用户为实时应用做出明智的决定，并为未来的研究和开发铺平了道路。 什么是卡夫卡？ 什么是NSQ？ 比较NSQ与Kafka; 为什么要在NSQ上进行卡夫卡？ Kafka - Distributed, fault tolerant, high throughput pub-sub messaging system. 7。 适用度，亲测为上好！ # NATS: Ruby then Go https://nats. We’ll start here, because we will talk about it’s MQTT vs NSQ: What are the differences? Message Delivery: MQTT follows a publish-subscribe model where messages are pushed to clients, ensuring that all clients receive the messages. Distributed messaging systems form the core of big data streaming, cloud native applications and microservice architecture as the system grows bigger. Replies (4) Tarun Batra. Reactive Programming. Compare NATS vs Kafka for distributed systems: Explore key differences in architecture, performance, and messaging patterns for building scalable infrastructure. Nsq vs Kafka. One-to-one vs one-to-many consumers: only one-to-many (seems strange at first glance, From queues to Kafka. While they serve similar purposes, there are significant differences between the two that can impact the design and performance of Kafka vs MSMQ: What are the differences? Introduction. As applications grow more complex and distributed, effective communication between services becomes crucial. 04K GitHub forks. Blog Posts. 2 功能需求. EMQ and Kafka are two popular messaging systems that are used for data streaming and processing in real-time. To understand the differences between a message queue and Kafka, and the use cases for Kafka, you must first NSQ es una plataforma de cola de mensajes distribuida de uso gratuito y DowLoad. Karşılaştırma NSQ vs Kafka# NSQ ve Kafka hem mesajlaşma kuyruğunun mimarilerini ve brokerlerinin nasıl çalıştığını tanımlamanın benzersiz bir yolu vardır, ancak birkaç noktada, hangi platformu tercih etmek istediğinizi düşünebilir: 谈谈分布式消息队列的一些特性，比较两种比较常用的消息队列——NSQ和Kafka 1 消息队列的作用 解耦，将一个流程加入一层数据接口拆分成两个部分，上游专注通知，下游专注处理 缓冲，应对流量的突然上涨变更，消息队列有很好的缓冲削峰作用 异步，上游发送消息以后可以马上返回，处理工作 Questo articolo del blog delinea la moderna piattaforma di coda di messaggistica NSQ vs Kafka. Kafka vs NSQ vs RabbitMQ Kafka vs NSQ Amazon SQS vs NSQ Apache RocketMQ vs Kafka vs RabbitMQ NSQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ. 高可靠性：RabbitMQ和Kafka均具备高可用性和数据持久化能力。 nsq也具有轻量易用的特点，通过服务发现构建订阅关系，具有完善的消息确认机制，以及直接可用的一定程度持久化措施。 不足之处在于各节点定位对称，负载不平衡时需要其他策略进行处理。 文章浏览阅读2. 7。 适用度，亲测为上好！ Comparação NSQ vs Kafka# NSQ e Kafka ambos a fila de mensagens têm uma maneira única de definir sua arquitetura e como o corretor funciona, mas em vários pontos, isso pode ser uma consideração em qual 在公司经常用到kafka和nsq，对他们的区别很好奇，总结一下： 一. NSQ vs RabbitMQ vs ZeroMQ: What are the differences? # Key Differences Between NSQ, RabbitMQ, and ZeroMQ NSQ, RabbitMQ, and ZeroMQ are messaging systems that serve different purposes and have unique features. 6K GitHub stars and 2. Kafka in its default configuration is faster than Pulsar in all latency benchmarks, and it is faster up to p99. for web sockets, or MQTT clients), and mirror maker or Replicator nodes on top of your broker nodes. gvqahowzndktyztdoyxfmhbvbbwtjwtqohbwfefjavviexrqcfvhaojyoqixsyfnhrsvuqlxtoskgfm